A Quick Look at Distro Rankings

A Comparison of Different Ranking Methods

Posted: 2022-03-05
Stats: 1062 words / ~5 minutes

I’m afraid I have the distrohop bug again. But, luckily for my sanity and my family, I will not be doing that anytime soon. My partner has seen what happens when that happens. I disappear for the better part of a day. Thinking about it is a nice exercise, though, and it allows me to learn what’s going on in the world of Linux distributions.

I am a “desktop Linux user”. I don’t program anything, and it has been months since I’ve had to build a package that is not available in the Debian package repository. If something doesn’t work, I just star it on GitHub or forget about it. Like many desktop users, I have the habit of taking a peek at DistroWatch from time to time. I tend to glance at the DistroWatch page rankings at least once a month.

I was first told about DistroWatch in 2002. When I was at university, my good friend was a Linux user. I believe he used Slackware at the time. His desktop was confusing and interesting at the same time. Since then, I look at the site. It is truly very useful, if only for knowing what distros are based on Ubuntu LTS and getting little updates about releases. I can only assume that a good number of people use that site as well.

I also like to see the difference between the page hit rankings, the visitor ratings, and the trends. This is how I got to writing this post. Do these rankings actually mean anything? What are the true “mainstream” distros?

Ranking Comparison

As I had some free time today, I started making comparisons. I chose a not-very-reliable method. I took the top 21 distros from DistroWatch’s page hit rankings from the last six months (to include Arch) and compared those to the global rankings from SimilarWeb. SimilarWeb is an alternative to Alexa.com, which will soon shut down. As I write this, I realize that I should have used just one country, and not the global rankings. But, the end results works out well.

The table below lists the distros by DistroWatch rank. The rightmost column is the global ranking from SimilarWeb.

DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking Trends vs SimilarWeb Rankings

(information gathered 2022-03-05)

DW Rank Distro SW Rank
1 MX Linux 123,888
2 EndeavourOS 69,927
3 Mint 19,755
4 Manjaro 28,875
5 Pop!_0S 75,268 1
6 Ubuntu 8,959
7 Garuda 107,654
8 Debian 22,133
9 Fedora 57,025
10 elemantary 128,442
11 Zorin 46,294
12 openSUSE 68,228
13 Slackware 288,450
14 antiX 404,101
15 KDE Neon 40,615 2
16 Lite 200,193
17 Solus 199,704
18 Kali 21,201
19 PCLinuxOS 357,687
20 Kubuntu 217,700
21 Arch 16,512

There are no surprises here. The top six SimilarWeb rankings are:

  1. Ubuntu
  2. Arch
  3. Mint
  4. Kali
  5. Debian
  6. Manjaro

The top six distros include what we expect. User-friendly choices Ubuntu, Mint and Manjaro, Unixporn favourite Arch, and old man Debian. Kali might not seem like a top choice, but it has become synonymous with “ethical hacking”, and received a significant boost being featured on the TV Series Mr. Robot.

Google Trends: Mr. Robot vs Kali

The first season of the series ran from 24 June 2015 to 2 September 2015. Season 2 from 13 July to 21 September 2016. Season 3 from 11 October to 13 December 2017. The final season ran from 6 October to 22 December 2019. You’ll need to zoom in a little, but there are tiny upticks for Kali Linux coinciding with each season of Mr. Robot. As people lost interest in the series, during a hiatus between seasons, there was also a slight loss in interest for Kali. I have just now realized that I did not watch that final season.


Social media plays an important role in everything, so I decided to take a look at the “social buzz” of those six distros. I used Social Searcher for this. This is not the perfect solution, as it does not really take into account things like forums or Mastodon, but the numbers are interesting to look at.

With Social Searcher, it is possible to have a general look at the “sentiment” users have towards these distros.

Comparison of sentiment toward Linux Distributions

You can see that for the most part, people are quite neutral in their opinion. Kali seems to win in the “Positive Sentiment” category, with Manjaro coming in a close second. Ubuntu proves that the more users/customers that you have, the more complaints. If there were a way to search across more sources, I am sure we could paint a better picture.

Not wanting to leave MX without its fair due, I took a look. And I was a little surprised.

Sentiment towards MX Linux

MX appears to have a low percentage of negative sentiment shared on social networks. A very low percentage! Positive opinion is off the charts. Is it the lack of systemd? Having used MX in the past, I can agree that I was very happy with that distro. It was great for my old computer.


The main conclusion I can draw from these numbers is that Arch is far more mainstream than its users make it out to be. Either that, or its users need to visit the site so often to look for direction that it boosts the distro’s global page ranking. Also, Ubuntu needs to do something to increase the positive sentiment. As the door to the world of Linux for many users, the experience should be more positive. Finally, it might be worth noting that many Linux websites are less than inviting. As Matt from The Linux Cast pointed out recently, Linux has a website problem.

Arch has things down with access to documentation, MX has lots of YouTube videos posted by the devs, Mint gives us an easy to find download button and instructions, but Ubuntu has company logos everywhere and a variety of choices for download (do I want LTS or the newest version?). Debian’s website has a big download button, but it is for the version without non-free firmware, meaning that users could spend time installing something that may not work, and a new user would not understand why (I know, I’ve been there).

  1. The URL to the distro was not ranked, I used the domain. ↩︎

  2. The URL to the distro was not ranked, I used the domain. ↩︎

You can or contact me if you wish to comment or propose a correction.